
Norm Faiola
|
ost hotels at some time
host VIP events, and
whether hosting a family
from Washington, D.C., or
the First Family residing there,
our responsibility is to protect
them while they stay at our
properties. The difference is
that the First Family comes
with the U.S. Secret Service.
I’ve worked with the Secret
Service several times. They know their business
and have an excellent track record in protecting
VIPs. The quote below from their website is a
reminder. The real goal is prevention of an incident,
including foodborne illness. Some of the
terms in this quote are from our HACCP language
(prevention, threat assessment, potential risks).
“The protection of an individual is comprehensive
and goes well beyond surrounding the
individual with well-armed agents. As part of the
Secret Service's mission of preventing an incident
before it occurs, the agency relies on meticulous
advance work and threat assessments developed
by its intelligence division to identify potential
risks to protectees.”
(www.secretservice.gov/protection_works.shtml).
Protecting guests from foodborne illness is a
proactive process. When discussing internal controls,
two factors lay the foundation for systems:
policies and procedures. Two words, “opportunity”
and “need,” should be considered. We
assume employees have a need to “liberate our
assets for personal use or sale” at some point.
We plan so the opportunity is minimized.
A modified version of this fiscal orientation is
appropriate for food safety. Replace the term
“need” with “desire.” So here is the real question:
What if an employee has the desire to harm
guests (VIPs)? What if they attempt to incorporate
hazards into food production and service systems?
Is there a plan to minimize the probability
of success of intentional criminal activity?
First, the key is prevention. We must create
prevention-based systems and policies. A food
safety system must be analyzed for weaknesses
that could provide an opportunity for malicious
activity by an employee with a desire to harm
guests via food and beverage. A risk assessment
review across the entire operational flow within
an operation is a good place to start. It lays the
foundation for a security plan as part of an operation’s
overall standard operating procedures
(SOPs). From purveyor/supplier reviews, move on
to receiving, storage, preparation, pre-service
holding, then on to serving food and beverage. At
each stage, consider “people-products-facilities.”
PEOPLE
- The hiring process screens potential employees
based on a risk/needed access model.
- Access to the operation, especially preparation
and storage areas, is limited; employee and customer
access is controlled and monitored.
- The culture of an organization encourages staff to
report unusual behavior or food-related security
matters to management. A formal system is developed
and communicated for doing so.
- The culture of the organization and SOPs control
employee access to food production when
those employees experience symptoms of
foodborne illness.
PRODUCTS
- Access to the receiving area is limited and
monitored. Receiving activities are recorded by
video and held in storage for at least 90 days.
- During receiving, delivery vehicles are monitored
and secured to limit access if the load
will be left unattended.
- Product inspection includes checking for signs
of tampering. Signs of repackaging should be
seen as a red flag.
- Unusual items within
an order are verified.
Receiving personnel are
informed about and
trained to identify new
items and can verify
packaging and contents.
- Production and service
staff are trained to
proactively review
products for signs of
tampering.
- Self-serve buffet areas
are monitored by onsite
personnel and
video monitoring.
Attendants are trained
to watch guests’ behavior
for potential acts
that might introduce
contaminants into the
food on display.
- Control chemicals used
for maintenance. A
product that is out of
place (not identified as
an operational standard)
is identified by employees
and reported.
FACILITIES
- Storage areas are
monitored and access
is limited. Video monitoring
is suggested.
- For “very VIP” events, products are received,
stored, and isolated. Access by general staff is
prohibited. Special package seals are used to
denote tampering.
- Continuous temperature monitoring is in place
for refrigerated storage areas. Computerized
temperature databases are secure, and access to
data is limited.
- Access to utility areas is limited and monitored.
Water, HVAC systems, and waste areas are controlled.
Potable water is regularly tested, especially
in operations with private water systems.
Please review the excellent guidelines contained
in the documents noted in the sources
below. All of us must develop risk assessment
plans to deal with potential threats, including those
that may come from within the organization.
SOURCES
- FSIS: Industry Self-Assessment Checklist for Food Security,
April 2005, www.FSIS.USDA.GOV (see Security Guide)
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration: Retail Food Stores
and Food Service Establishments: Food Security Preventive
Measures Guidance, December 17, 2003,
www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/secgui11.html
- United States Secret Service,
www.secretservice.gov/protection_
works.shtml
Norm Faiola, Ph.D., is associate dean and associate professor, Department of Nutrition and Hospitality management, Syracuse University. Email Dr. Faiola with questions or comments: nafaiola@syr.edu.
|
|
|
|
| |